Differentiation between restrictive cardiomyopathy and constrictive pericarditis by early diastolic Doppler myocardial velocity gradient at the posterior wall

Citation
P. Palka et al., Differentiation between restrictive cardiomyopathy and constrictive pericarditis by early diastolic Doppler myocardial velocity gradient at the posterior wall, CIRCULATION, 102(6), 2000, pp. 655-662
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
CIRCULATION
ISSN journal
00097322 → ACNP
Volume
102
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
655 - 662
Database
ISI
SICI code
0009-7322(20000808)102:6<655:DBRCAC>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
Background-The differential diagnosis between restrictive cardiomyopathy (R CM) and constrictive pericarditis (CP) is challenging and, despite combined information from different diagnostic tests, surgical exploration is often necessary. Methods and Results-A group of 55 subjects (mean age, 63 +/- 11 years; 36 m en and 19 women) were enrolled in the study; 15 had RCM 10 had CPI and 30 w ere age-matched, normal controls. The diagnosis of RCM was supported by a b iopsy; in the CP group, the diagnosis was confirmed either surgically or at autopsy. All patients underwent a transthoracic echocardiogram that includ ed the assessment of Doppler myocardial velocity gradient (MVG), as measure d from the left ventricular posterior wall during the predetermined phases of the cardiac cycle. MVG was lower (P<0.01) in RCM patients compared with both CP patients and normal controls during ventricular ejection (2.8+/-1.2 versus 4.4+/-1.0 and 4.7+/-0.8 s(-1), respectively) and rapid ventricular filling (1.9+/-0.8 versus 8.7+/-1.7 and 3.7+/-1.4 s(-1) respectively). Addi tionally, during isovolumic relaxation, MVG was positive in RCM patients an d negative in both CP patients and normal controls (0.7+/-0.4 versus -1.0+/ -0.6 and -0.4+/-0.3 s(-1), respectively; P<0.01). During atrial contraction , MVG was similarly low (P<0.01) in both RCM and CP patients compared with normal controls (1.6+/-1.7 and 1.7+/-1.8 versus 3.8+/-0.9 s(-1), respective ly). Conclusions-Doppler myocardial imaging-derived MVG, as measured from the le ft ventricular posterior wall in early diastole during both isovolumic rela xation and rapid ventricular filling, allows for the discrimination of RCM from CP.