Hereditary and environmental dental findings in identification of human remains

Citation
H. Brkic et al., Hereditary and environmental dental findings in identification of human remains, COLL ANTROP, 24, 2000, pp. 79-83
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Sociology & Antropology
Journal title
COLLEGIUM ANTROPOLOGICUM
ISSN journal
03506134 → ACNP
Volume
24
Year of publication
2000
Supplement
1
Pages
79 - 83
Database
ISI
SICI code
0350-6134(200007)24:<79:HAEDFI>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
The paper presents the results on hereditary and environmental dental findi ngs in identification of human remains exhumed from, mass graves in the Rep ublic of Croatia. The total of 17.880 teeth from all the categories (inciso rs, canines, premolars and molars) was examined Hereditary findings of the teeth such as shape, size, position, as well as age were used in all of the cases confirming and completing the identification. In only 15% of the cas es they were the starting points for the identification that would be later confirmed with another 3 - 5 traditional identification procedures, Distur bances in tooth eruption were recorded in 22% of the cases, impaction of te eth in 10%, and retarded eruption of teeth in 12%. Disturbances of tooth po sition were recorded in 65% of the cases. Tooth rotation in 26% and diastem a mediana in maxilla or mandible in 39%. Disorders of tooth number in the f orm of unilateral and bilateral missing of lateral maxillary incisors were recorded only in 2% of the monitored cases. Abnormalities of the tooth shap e were found in 11% of the cases. The majority of them were found on the to oth crowns 6%, and less on the tooth roots 5%. Environmental dental finding s that were the most significant for the identifications were prosthetic ap pliances in 30% of cases. Prostheses were helpful in the identification of 3% of the cases, while crowns and bridges were helpful in 27% of the cases. Ante mortem teeth extractions were helpful in 25% of the cases. Teeth rest orations were recorded in 20 % of the identified cases, amalgams in 19% and aesthetic filings in 1%. Dental caries was helpful in only 10% of the case s, superficial caries in 3% and caries of dentin in. 7% of cases.