Following the identification of the CB2 receptor several groups explored th
e development of selective ligands for this receptor which occurs principal
ly in the periphery. This led to the discovery that two cannabimimetic indo
les, 1-(2,3-dichlorobenzoyl)-2-methyl-3-(2-[1-morpholino]ethyl)-5-methoxyin
dole (L768242) and 2-methyl-1-propyl-3-(1-naphthoyl)indole (JWH-015) have h
igh affinity for the CB2 receptor with low affinity for the CB1 receptor. S
hortly thereafter two 1- IPI methoxy-Delta(8)-THC analogues, 1-methoxy-Delt
a(8)-THC-DMH (L759633) and 1-methoxy-Delta(9(11))-THC-DMH (L759656), were a
lso found to have high affinity for the CB2 receptor and very little affini
ty for the CBI receptor. Almost simultaneously two 1-deoxy-Delta(8)-THC ana
logues, 1-deoxy-11-hydroxy-Delta(8)-THC-DMH (JWH-051) and 1-deoxy-Delta(8)-
THC-DMH (JWH-057) were reported to have high affinity for the CB1 receptor,
but even greater affinity for the CB2 receptor. These discoveries gave ris
e to a concerted effort by Huffman and co-workers to explore the structure-
activity relationships (SAR) at CB2 of cannabimimetic indoles and 1-deoxy-D
elta(8)-THC analogues. These efforts have resulted in the synthesis and pha
rmacological evaluation of a number of derivatives of 3-(1-naphthoyl)indole
s and 1-deoxy-Delta(8)-THC analogues with various side chains. This review
will describe the current status of the results of these studies and discus
s the SAR for both these classes of ligands.