Zygote intrafallopian transfer in patients with tubal factor infertility after repeated failure of implantation with in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer
J. Farhi et al., Zygote intrafallopian transfer in patients with tubal factor infertility after repeated failure of implantation with in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer, FERT STERIL, 74(2), 2000, pp. 390-393
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of zygote intrafallopian transfer (ZIFT
) in terms of implantation and pregnancy rates in patients with tubal facto
r infertility and repeated implantation failure in IVF-ET cycles.
Design: Retrospective analysis of ZIFT cycles.
Setting: An IVF unit in a university hospital.
Patient(s): Criteria for patient selection for ZIFT included at least four
failures of implantation in IVF-ET cycles in which at least 3 embryos were
replaced per transfer and a cause of infertility diagnosed as male, unexpla
ined, or tubal factor with proof of one patient tube.
Intervention(s): Four to six zygotes were transferred by laparoscopy into t
he fallopian tube 24-26 hours after oocyte retrieval.
Main Outcome Measure(s): Implantation and pregnancy rates were determined i
n 112 ZIFT cycles performed in 81 patients with repeated failure of implant
ation. Results were further stratified for patients with tubal factor (n =
15) and patients without tubal factor (n = 66).
Result(s): The pregnancy and implantation rates for all ZIFT cycles were 35
.1% and 11.1%, respectively. pregnancy and implantation rates per cycle in
patients with tubal factor versus patients without tubal factor were 26.6%
versus 37.1% and 9.4% versus 11.4%, respectively.
Conclusion(s): ZIFT can be considered as a mode of treatment for patients w
ith repeated failure of implantation in IVF-ET and with tubal factor with p
roved patency of one tube. (C)2000 by American Society fur Reproductive Med
icine.