Background: The use of open access endoscopy is increasing. Its effect on t
he adequacy of patient informed consent, procedure acceptance and the impac
t on subsequent communication/transfer of procedure results to the patient
have not been evaluated. The aim of our study was to compare the extent of
preknowledge of procedures and test explanation, patient medical complexity
, information transfer and overall patient satisfaction between a patient g
roup referred for outpatient open access endoscopy versus a patient group f
rom a gastrointestinal (GI) subspecialty clinic.
Methods: information was obtained from all patients presenting for outpatie
nt upper and lower endoscopy by using a 1-page questionnaire. Patients from
the two groups who had an outpatient upper/lower endoscopic procedure were
contacted by phone after the procedure to obtain information with a standa
rdized questionnaire.
Results: The open access patients reported receiving significantly less inf
ormation to help them identify the procedure (p < 0.01) and less explanatio
n concerning the nature of the procedure than the group of patients referre
d from the subspecialty clinic (p < 0.005). There was no difference between
the two groups in satisfaction scores for examinations performed under con
scious sedation. For flexible sigmoidoscopy without sedation, however, the
GI clinic patient group were more satisfied with their procedure. The major
ity of patients, regardless of access, were more likely to receive endoscop
ic results from a gastroenterologist than the referring physician. Furtherm
ore, the patients in the GI clinic group who underwent colonoscopy felt sig
nificantly better at follow-up.
Conclusions: Patients undergoing open access procedures are less likely to
be properly informed about their endoscopic procedure. Our results indicate
that with open access endoscopy, a defined mechanism needs to be in place
for communication of endoscopic results to the patient.