Mass tort class actions: What defendants have and plaintiffs don't

Authors
Citation
D. Rosenberg, Mass tort class actions: What defendants have and plaintiffs don't, HARV J LEG, 37(2), 2000, pp. 393-431
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Law
Journal title
HARVARD JOURNAL ON LEGISLATION
ISSN journal
0017808X → ACNP
Volume
37
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
393 - 431
Database
ISI
SICI code
0017-808X(200022)37:2<393:MTCAWD>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
Defendants litigate common questions in mass tort claims from the posture o f a de facto class action, allowing them to exploit economies of scale. In contrast, plaintiffs' claims are rarely 100% aggregated, preventing plainti ffs from making the optimal investment in common questions to maximize the aggregate and individual value of their claims. This Essay explains the adv antages of scale economies and discusses the social costs of the systemic b ias favoring defendants over plaintiffs. The author argues that this system ic bias can be corrected through mass tort class actions.