Defendants litigate common questions in mass tort claims from the posture o
f a de facto class action, allowing them to exploit economies of scale. In
contrast, plaintiffs' claims are rarely 100% aggregated, preventing plainti
ffs from making the optimal investment in common questions to maximize the
aggregate and individual value of their claims. This Essay explains the adv
antages of scale economies and discusses the social costs of the systemic b
ias favoring defendants over plaintiffs. The author argues that this system
ic bias can be corrected through mass tort class actions.