I. Brown, Involving the public in general practice in an urban district: levels and type of activity and perceptions of obstacles, HEAL SOC C, 8(4), 2000, pp. 251-259
This paper reports on a study of the level and type of activity used to inv
olve the public in general practice in a city district in the north of Engl
and. The association of these activities with features of the general pract
ice organisation and environment were studied. Service providers' perceptio
ns of obstacles were also studied. Data were collected in a survey of all g
eneral practice organisations in the district using a postal questionnaire
completed by a practice manager. Interviews were conducted with health serv
ice managers responsible for primary care development in the district. The
study showed that the district had a good track record for innovation in pr
imary care development and in giving emphasis to developing public involvem
ent. However, it also showed that it was difficult to translate policy rhet
oric into practical initiatives at the general practice level without evide
nce of models of best practice, and with limited resources. The survey had
a high response of over 84%. it showed that levels of activity were low acr
oss the district and only a small minority of general practice teams had un
dertaken a range of activities to involve the public. The socio-economic en
vironment did not appear to be a factor, but small practices (one or two pa
rtners and/or practice population under 3000) were much less likely to deve
lop activities. Pressures of existing workload, lack of resources and publi
c apathy were given as among the main obstacles by survey respondents. The
study indicates the challenges faced by Primary Care Groups iii developing
strands of public involvement. Primary care teams need a dear strategic fra
mework, models of best practice, and adequate resources to manage, change a
nd develop initiatives.