We designed Knowledge Integration Environment (KIE) debate projects to take
advantage of internet resources and promote student understanding of scien
ce. Design decisions were guided by the Scaffolded Knowledge Integration in
structional framework. We report on design studies that test and elaborate
on our instructional framework. Our learning studies assess the arguments s
tudents construct using the Knowledge Integration Environment debate projec
t about light propagation and, explore the relationship between students' v
iews of the nature of science and argument construction. We examine how stu
dents use evidence, determine when they add further ideas and claims and me
asure progress in understanding light propagation. To a modeate degree, stu
dents' views of the nature of science align with the quality of the argumen
ts.