Cl. Liu et Aj. Illingworth, Toward more accurate retrievals of ice water content from radar measurements of clouds, J APPL MET, 39(7), 2000, pp. 1130-1146
There has been considerable discussion concerning the accuracy of values of
ice water content (IWC) in ice clouds derived from measurements of radar r
eflectivity (Z). In this paper, the various published relationships that ar
e based on ice particle size spectra recorded from aircraft are analyzed, a
nd it is shown that a relationship between ice water content and reflectivi
ty can be derived (IWC = 0.137Z(0.64) at 94 GHZ and IWC = 0.097Z(0.59) at 3
5 GHz), which only varies by 20%-30% for different climatological areas, pr
oviding the same ice density as a function of particle size is assumed. Unc
ertainty as to the true variation of density of ice particles with size may
reduce the average IWC for a given Z by up to 30% for an IWC of approximat
e to 0.1 g m(-3) and 20% for an IWC of approximate to 0.01 g m(-3). Individ
ual values of IWC derived from a single measurement of Z are likely to have
an error of about + 100% and -50%, bur if some characteristic size estimat
e is available, this is reduced to about +50% and -30%. The remaining error
s are due to deviations of the size spectra from exponentiality, so there i
s no advantage in measuring the characteristic size more precisely than thi
s limit. Remote sensing of ice particle size is not trivial, and it is show
n that if instead of size, an estimate of the temperature of the ice cloud
to within 6 I; is available, then, rather surprisingly, the reduction in th
e error of IWC is almost as good as that achieved using size. Essentially t
his result is reflecting the well-known correlation of crystal size with te
mperature. When the mean values of IWC for a given Z and T are compared for
a tropical and midlatitude dataset using a common ice density variation wi
th size, then the difference is usually less than 25%. A spaceborne instrum
ent may need to integrate over horizontal distances of 10 km to achieve suf
ficient sensitivity; this necessity may introduce a bias into the retrieved
IWC because the relationship between IWC and Z is not linear, but analysis
shows that any bias should be less than 10%.