Inter-laboratory comparison of liquid chromatographic techniques and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the determination of surfactants in wastewaters
M. Castillo et al., Inter-laboratory comparison of liquid chromatographic techniques and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the determination of surfactants in wastewaters, J CHROMAT A, 889(1-2), 2000, pp. 195-209
Seven laboratories participated in an inter-laboratory comparison exercise
within the framework of the PRISTINE, SANDRINE and INEXsPORT European Union
Projects. Solid-phase extraction (SPE) methodologies were used for the ext
raction of target analytes from wastewaters. The analytical strategies were
based on liquid chromatography (LC) coupled to mass spectrometric (MS) or
to fluorescent (FL) detection in all cases with the exception of one labora
tory using a test-tube enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit. Samples were
spiked with the surfactants nonylphenolpolyglycol ether, coconut diethanola
mide, linear alkylbenzene sulfonate, nonylphenolpolyglycol ether sulfate, a
lkylpolyglycol ether and secondary alkane sulfonate. After enrichment on pr
eviously conditioned SPE cartridges, the SPE cartridges were distributed am
ong the participating laboratories without the information about the amount
of spiked surfactants. in addition, SPE cartridges loaded with a real-worl
d environmental sample containing a tannery wastewater were also analyzed.
The results of the programme showed that SPE followed by LC-MS techniques a
re reliable for the surfactants determination at submicrogram to microgram
per liter levels in wastewaters. Inter-laboratory precision values were cal
culated as the reproducibility relative standard deviation (RSDR) which was
determined from the reproducibility standard deviation (s(R)) and the aver
age concentration at a particular concentration level. When data from all l
aboratories were pooled, the RSDR values ranged from 5.1 to 28.3% for the d
etermination of target analytes. The most accurate result corresponded to t
hat given for linear alkylbenzene sulfonates. Taking into account that diff
erent methodologies were used (including non-chromatographic techniques) an
d the complexity of the samples analyzed, it can be considered that accepta
ble reproducibility values were obtained in this inter-laboratory study. (C
) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.