Rapid automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Streptococcus pneumoniae by use of the bioMerieux VITEK 2

Citation
Jh. Jorgensen et al., Rapid automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Streptococcus pneumoniae by use of the bioMerieux VITEK 2, J CLIN MICR, 38(8), 2000, pp. 2814-2818
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Immunolgy & Infectious Disease",Microbiology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY
ISSN journal
00951137 → ACNP
Volume
38
Issue
8
Year of publication
2000
Pages
2814 - 2818
Database
ISI
SICI code
0095-1137(200008)38:8<2814:RAASTO>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
The VITEK 2 is a new automated instrument for rapid organism identification and susceptibility testing. It has the capability of performing rapid susc eptibility testing of Streptococcus pneumoniae with specially configured ca rds that contain enriched growth medium and antimicrobial agents relevant f or this organism. The present study compared the results of testing of a gr oup of 53 challenge strains of pneumococci with known resistance properties and a collection of clinical isolates examined in two study phases with a total of 402 and 416 isolates, respectively, with a prototype of the VITEK 2. Testing was conducted in three geographically separate laboratories; the challenge collection was tested by all three laboratories, and the unique clinical isolates were tested separately by the individual laboratories. Th e VITEK 2 results of tests with 10 antimicrobial agents were compared to th e results generated by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Stand ards reference broth microdilution MIC test method. Excellent interlaborato ry agreement was observed with the challenge strains. The overall agreement within a single twofold dilution of MICs defined by the VITEK 2 and refere nce method with the clinical isolates was 96.3%, although there were a numb er of off-scale MICs that could not be compared. The best agreement with th e clinical isolates was achieved with ofloxacin and chloramphenicol (100%), and the lowest level of agreement among those drugs with sufficient on-sca le MICs occurred with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (89.7%). Overall there were 1.3% very major 6.6% minor, and no major interpretive category errors encountered with the clinical isolates, although >80% of the minor interpre tive errors involved only a single log, dilution difference. The mean time for generation of susceptibility results with the clinical isolates was 8.1 h. The VITEK 2 provided rapid, reliable susceptibility category determinat ions with both the challenge and clinical isolates examined in this study.