Comparison and application of a novel genotyping method, semiautomated primer-specific and mispair extension analysis, and four other genotyping assays for detection of hepatitis C virus mixed-genotype infections

Citation
Yw. Hu et al., Comparison and application of a novel genotyping method, semiautomated primer-specific and mispair extension analysis, and four other genotyping assays for detection of hepatitis C virus mixed-genotype infections, J CLIN MICR, 38(8), 2000, pp. 2807-2813
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Immunolgy & Infectious Disease",Microbiology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY
ISSN journal
00951137 → ACNP
Volume
38
Issue
8
Year of publication
2000
Pages
2807 - 2813
Database
ISI
SICI code
0095-1137(200008)38:8<2807:CAAOAN>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
To date the true prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) mixed-genotype infec tions has not been established mainly because currently available methods a re not suitable for the detection of mixed genotypes in a viral population. A novel semiautomated genotyping method, primer-specific and mispair exten sion analysis (S-PSMEA), which is more reliable than other genotyping assay s was developed for detection of HCV mixed-genotype infections. A genotype present at levels as low as 0.8% in a defined mix of HCV genotypes was dete cted, showing a 20-fold increase in sensitivity over that of direct DNA seq uencing. A total of 434 HCV isolates were genotyped and analyzed for a comp arative study of the accuracy between S-PSMEA and four current genotyping m ethods. The results showed that viruses in approximately 40% of the samples from this group determined to be infected with mixed genotypes by S-PSMEA were undetected by direct DNA sequencing due to its low sensitivity. Type-s pecific PCR, line probe assay, and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis performed poorly, being able to identify only 38.5, 16.1, and 15. 4% of mixed-genotype infections, respectively, that were detected by direct DNA sequencing. The prevalence of mixed-genotype infections detected by S- PSMEA was 7.9% (12 of 152 donors) among HCV-infected blood donors, 14.3% (1 5 of 105) among patients with chronic hepatitis C, and 17.1% (6 of 36) amon g thalassemia patients who had received multiple transfusions. The data lea d us to conclude that HCV mixed-genotype infections are more common than pr eviously estimated and that S-PSMEA may be the method of choice when detect ion of genotypes present at low levels in mixed-genotype infections is requ ired due to its higher level of sensitivity.