Northern fowl mites were monitored on a caged-layer operation in southern C
alifornia for 22 mo. Three experienced observers underestimated actual numb
ers of mites in the vent region approximate to 80% of the time. Errors were
higher for heavy infestations. Observer estimates were highly correlated w
ith each other (r > 0.89, P < 0.01) and with mite numbers estimated by vent
feather removal (r > 0.82, P < 0.01). Mites on hens varied between houses
and over time. Molting consistently reduced mite numbers, but did not elimi
nate them in a flock. Long-term monitoring of individual sentinel hens demo
nstrated that some hens would support high numbers of mites for several mon
ths or more. Use of a new sequential hen sampling plan required approximate
to 1 min per hen, if mite numbers were estimated. At this site, treatment
decisions often could be reached in <20 min per house. Mite scores (index o
f estimated mites per hen) were well correlated with percentage of hens inf
ested in both test houses. In a chronically infested house, prevalence of m
ites on eggs averaged 8.5%, with a range of 0-55%. Applications of tetrachl
orvinphos-dichlorvos by the producer appeared to be based on mites on > abo
ut 20% of eggs. The chemical was marginal for controlling mites on hens (25
% reduction in percentage of hens infested), but effectively reduced mites
on eggs (95% fewer mites an eggs at 1 wk and 90% at 2 wk). When data were g
rouped by mite index score on hens, there was a strong relationship (r(2) =
0.83, P < 0.01) between mite prevalence on eggs and the scores of the hens
which laid them. Sampling 100 eggs evenly spaced in a house required <7 mi
n, and adult mites were easily seen. Sampling mites on eggs appears to be u
seful to localize at least high-level infestations, and egg-based sampling
for mites merits further investigation.