A. Edwards et al., Judging the 'weight of evidence' in systematic reviews: introducing rigourinto the qualitative overview stage by assessing Signal and Noise, J EVAL CL P, 6(2), 2000, pp. 177-184
The 'weight of evidence' in a topic area can be judged by assessing the 'Si
gnal' from available research publications and tempering the importance att
ached by the level of 'Noise' (the inverse of methodological quality). This
assessment process has validity and reliability and can be applied to the
'qualitative overview' stage of systematic reviews. This enables the import
ant themes and areas of relevance to the research question to be identified
. Important findings from individual papers may also be identified providin
g further information which may not be evident from quantitative analysis.
The findings from these more qualitative stages of analysis complement, but
do not replace, quantitative analysis.