Judging the 'weight of evidence' in systematic reviews: introducing rigourinto the qualitative overview stage by assessing Signal and Noise

Citation
A. Edwards et al., Judging the 'weight of evidence' in systematic reviews: introducing rigourinto the qualitative overview stage by assessing Signal and Noise, J EVAL CL P, 6(2), 2000, pp. 177-184
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Health Care Sciences & Services
Journal title
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
ISSN journal
13561294 → ACNP
Volume
6
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
177 - 184
Database
ISI
SICI code
1356-1294(200005)6:2<177:JT'OEI>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
The 'weight of evidence' in a topic area can be judged by assessing the 'Si gnal' from available research publications and tempering the importance att ached by the level of 'Noise' (the inverse of methodological quality). This assessment process has validity and reliability and can be applied to the 'qualitative overview' stage of systematic reviews. This enables the import ant themes and areas of relevance to the research question to be identified . Important findings from individual papers may also be identified providin g further information which may not be evident from quantitative analysis. The findings from these more qualitative stages of analysis complement, but do not replace, quantitative analysis.