U. Kaul et al., Multi-vessel coronary stenting - Procedural results and late clinical outcomes: A comparison with single-vessel stenting, J INVAS CAR, 12(8), 2000, pp. 410-415
The purpose of this study was to assess the 1-year clinical outcome of pati
ents with multi-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent coronary
stenting, and to compare the results with single-vessel coronary stenting
carried out during the same period.
We evaluated the in-hospital and 12-month clinical outcomes [death, Q-wave
myocardial infarction (MI) and repeat revascularization rates at one year]
in 384 consecutive patients treated with coronary stents in 2 (92% of patie
nts) or 3 of the native coronary arteries and compared the outcome to 624 c
onsecutive patients undergoing stenting in a single coronary artery between
January 1, 1997 and January 31, 1999. The overall procedural success was o
btained in 99% of patients with 2- or 3-vessel stenting and 98% of patients
with single-vessel stenting. Procedural complications were similar (2.9% v
s 2.6%; p = 0.12). During follow-up, target lesion revascularization was 16
% in multi-vessel and 14% in single-vessel stenting (p = 0.38) and repeat r
evascularization was also similar for both groups (19% vs. 20%; p = 0.73),
There was no difference in death (0.8% vs. 1.3%; p = 0.31) and Q-wave MI (0
.7% vs. 1.4%; p = 0.16) in the 2 groups. Overall cardiac event-free surviva
l was similar for both groups (76% vs. 78%; p = 0.54). Multi-vessel stentin
g in carefully selected patients in our experience had a high procedural su
ccess with very low complication rates. The one-year clinical outcomes were
acceptable and were similar to the results of single-vessel stenting.