Utilizing a collaborative therapeutic assessment (TA) model proposed by Fin
n and Tonsager (1997), we examined the interaction between therapeutic alli
ance and in-session process during the assessment phase of treatment. This
study compares the utility of the TA model (n = 38) versus a traditional in
formation gathering model (n = 90) of assessment. The results of this study
indicate that the use of a TA model may decrease the number of patients wh
o terminate treatment against medical advice. The Session Evaluation Questi
onnaire (Stiles & Snow, 1984), Combined Alliance Short Form (Watcher & Bare
nds. 1996), and Penn Helping Alliance Questionnaire-Revised (Barber & Crits
-Christoph, 1996) call reliably measure the patient's experience of the ass
essment. The psychological assessment process may impact the patient's expe
rience of assessment feedback and aid in the development of a therapeutic a
lliance. The therapeutic alliance developed during the assessment wits foun
d to be related to alliance early in psychotherapy. We discuss the theoreti
cal, clinical, and research implications of these findings.