The authors test the performance of a number of global hedge funds over a f
our-year period in order to determine whether they could have been responsi
ble for the crash in the Asian currencies in 1997. They use Sharpe's style
analysis to measure the variations in the historical exposure of these fund
s to Asian currencies leading up to the crisis. The results indicate that f
und profits were not generally positive during the crisis, nor were funds'
estimated exposures to Asian currencies unusual. Consequently the authors f
ind no empirical evidence to support the hypothesis that George Sores, or a
ny other hedge fund manager, was responsible for the crisis. Style analysis
suggests that global managers actively vary their exposures to currencies,
but over the period 1993 through 1997 these fluctuations were not found to
be associated with moves in exchange rates.