Is it "sex"?: College students' interpretations of sexual behavior terminology

Citation
Lm. Bogart et al., Is it "sex"?: College students' interpretations of sexual behavior terminology, J SEX RES, 37(2), 2000, pp. 108-116
Citations number
38
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF SEX RESEARCH
ISSN journal
00224499 → ACNP
Volume
37
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
108 - 116
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-4499(200005)37:2<108:II"CSI>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
Little is known regarding how respondents interpret terms that are commonly used in sexual behavior surveys. The present study assessed the impact of four factors on respondents' judgements of whether the hypothetical actors "Jim" and "Susie" would consider a particular behavior that they had engage d in to be "sex." The four factors were respondent's gender, actor's gender , type of act (vaginal, anal, or oral intercourse), and who achieved orgasm (neither, Jim only, Susie only ol both). Two hundred twenty-three undergra duates (22.2 +/- 2.2 years; 65% female) were asked to read 16 scenarios fea turing Jim and Susie and to judge whether each actor would consider the des cribed behavior to be sex. Results indicated that vaginal and anal intercou rse were considered sex render most circumstances. Whether oral intercourse was labeled as sex depended on the gender and viewpoint of the actor, and whether orgasm occurred. Findings suggest that items in sexual behavior sur veys need to be clearly delineated to avoid subjective interpretations by r espondents.