Acoustic duration changes associated with two types of treatment for children who stutter

Citation
Gd. Riley et Jc. Ingham, Acoustic duration changes associated with two types of treatment for children who stutter, J SPEECH L, 43(4), 2000, pp. 965-978
Citations number
63
Categorie Soggetti
Rehabilitation
Journal title
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH
ISSN journal
10924388 → ACNP
Volume
43
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
965 - 978
Database
ISI
SICI code
1092-4388(200008)43:4<965:ADCAWT>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
The purpose of this study was (a) to examine in young children the effects of Speech Motor Training (SMT) on selected temporal acoustic durations cons idered to be related to speech motor programming, (b) to compare the speech motor effects of that treatment with those of a treatment of childhood stu ttering that did not directly incorporate speech motor control training (Ex tended Length of Utterance [ELU]), and (c) to examine the relation of acous tic duration changes to reduction of stuttering. Twelve children who stutte r were recorded while repeating syllable sets / p Lambda / and / t Lambda k a / before and after SMT (n = 6) or ELU treatment (n = 6). Children who did not stutter served as matched reference groups. The syllables beginning wi th /p/ and /t/ were used as tokens for the acoustic measurement. Five measu res served as indicators of temporal aspects of speech motor performance: v owel duration, stop gap duration, voice onset time, stop gap/vowel duration ratio, and total token duration. Results indicated that following SMT ther e was a significant increase in vowel duration and some reduction in stop g ap duration that resulted in significantly reduced stop gap/vowel duration ratios. These acoustic effects were consistent across most participants. Th e ELU treatment reduced stuttering more than the SMT, but was not accompani ed by significant effects on the selected temporal acoustic measures. These findings are compared With previous Findings of increased vowel durations associated with fluency enhancement and stuttering treatment. We speculate that the increased vowel durations allow more time for speech motor plannin g and that stuttering is reduced moderately as a by-product of longer vowel durations. The mechanism(s) by which ELU treatment reduces stuttering did not appear to be captured by the dependent variables measured in this study .