PREVENTION OF OCCUPATIONAL TRANSMISSION OF HUMAN-IMMUNODEFICIENCY-VIRUS AND HEPATITIS-B VIRUS AMONG ANESTHESIOLOGISTS - A SURVEY OF ANESTHESIOLOGY PRACTICE
Ar. Tait et Db. Tuttle, PREVENTION OF OCCUPATIONAL TRANSMISSION OF HUMAN-IMMUNODEFICIENCY-VIRUS AND HEPATITIS-B VIRUS AMONG ANESTHESIOLOGISTS - A SURVEY OF ANESTHESIOLOGY PRACTICE, Anesthesia and analgesia, 79(4), 1994, pp. 623-628
In light of the increasing prevalence of the human immunodeficiency vi
rus (HN) and hepatitis B virus (HBV), anesthesiologists are now likely
to see more patients who are at high risk for these viruses. Therefor
e, it is important that they adopt infection control policies aimed at
preventing occupational transmission of these and other pathogens dur
ing their clinical practice. This study was designed, using a question
naire format, to evaluate anesthesiologist compliance with Centers for
Disease Control (CDC) guidelines for the prevention of occupational t
ransmission of HIV and HBV. A total of 1149 questionnaires were mailed
to anesthesiologists randomly selected from the members' directory of
the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA). Of these, 493 (44%)
were completed and returned. Eighty-eight percent of respondents repor
ted that they always complied with CDC guidelines when presented with
an HIV-infected patient, but only 24.7% adhered to the guidelines when
the patient was considered low risk (P<0.01). This trend was also ref
lected in the use of gloves and other protective wear in the periopera
tive period. Although 70% of respondents indicated that they recapped
needles on a regular basis, this practice was not associated with an i
ncreased incidence of needlestick injuries. However, anesthesiologists
who reported recapping needles using the one-handed technique were le
ss likely to sustain a needlestick injury than those who recapped usin
g the two-handed technique. Thirty-one percent and 72% of respondents
respectively reported a clean or contaminated needlestick within the p
receeding 12 mo. Only 45.4% of those receiving a contaminated needlest
ick sought treatment. This study suggests that, although most anesthes
iologists use appropriate precautions for the prevention of occupation
al transmission of HN and HBV, they do not fully embrace the concept o
f universal precautions. Greater education and the development of impr
oved engineering controls for the prevention of transmission of these
pathogens seems, therefore, imperative.