Response to stimulation-evoked eccentric muscle contractions in hypertensive rats

Citation
Ja. Willett et al., Response to stimulation-evoked eccentric muscle contractions in hypertensive rats, MED SCI SPT, 32(8), 2000, pp. 1390-1398
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
ISSN journal
01959131 → ACNP
Volume
32
Issue
8
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1390 - 1398
Database
ISI
SICI code
0195-9131(200008)32:8<1390:RTSEMC>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the functional deficits observed in the skeletal muscles of adult, spontaneously hypertens ive rats (SHR) arise because of an inability of injured muscles to regenera te normally in the hypertensive environment, Methods: Force decline and rec overy were evaluated in SHR tibialis anterior (TA) at various times after a series of 192 eccentric contractions (TC). EC were produced by supramaxima l electrical stimulation of the sciatic nerve in anesthetized rats. Experim ents compared TA muscles in 3- and B-month-old SHR with TA in age-matched, normotensive Wistar-Kyoto rats (WKY) after one or three exposures to the EC protocol. The repeat exposures were separated by 10 d. Results: TA in SHR and WKY rats experienced a similar decline in strength and a similar level of recovery after one or three exposures to 192 EC. TA in both strains show ed a similar 10-15% increase in dry weight and cross-sectional area after t hree exposures to the EC protocol. Contractile strength increased by 16-28% in WKY TA after three exposures to EC, but the increase was limited to 7% in 3-month SHR TA and was nor evident in 6-month SHR TA, despite the 15% in crease in muscle mass. Conclusions: The data indicate that muscle mass and strength can increase in response to electrically evoked EC and that an inc rease in strength can be significantly greater than an increase in mass aft er the first few exposures to EC in normotensive animals. Maintained hypert ension does not increase the loss of contractile strength after vigorous EC but limits or prevents the EC-induced increase in muscle strength that acc ompanies repeated exposure to the protocol.