Differential baroreflex control of heart rate in sedentary and aerobicallyfit individuals

Citation
Sa. Smith et al., Differential baroreflex control of heart rate in sedentary and aerobicallyfit individuals, MED SCI SPT, 32(8), 2000, pp. 1419-1430
Citations number
41
Categorie Soggetti
Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
ISSN journal
01959131 → ACNP
Volume
32
Issue
8
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1419 - 1430
Database
ISI
SICI code
0195-9131(200008)32:8<1419:DBCOHR>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
Purpose: We compared arterial, aortic, and carotid-cardiac baroreflex sensi tivity in eight average fit (maximal oxygen uptake, (V) over dot (2max) = 4 2.2 +/- 1.9 mL.kg(-1).min(-1)) and eight high fit ((V) over dot (2max) = 61 .9 +/- 2.2 mL.kg(-1).min(-1)) healthy young adults. Methods: Arterial and a ortic (ABR) baroreflex functions were assessed utilizing hypo- and hyper-te nsive challenges induced by graded bolus injections of sodium nitroprusside (SN) and phenylephrine (PE), respectively. Carotid baroreflex (CBR) sensit ivity was determined using ramped 5-s pulses of both pressure and suction d elivered to the carotid sinus via a neck chamber collar, independent of dru g administration. Results: During vasoactive drug injection, mean arterial pressure (MAP) was similarly altered in average fit (AF) and high fit II-IF ) groups. However, the heart rate (HR) response range of the arterial baror eflex was significantly attenuated (P < 0.05) in HF (31 +/- 4 beats min-l) compared with AF individuals (46 +/- 4 beats min(-1)). When sustained neck suction and pressure were applied to counteract altered carotid sinus press ure during SN and PE administration, isolating the ABR response, the respon se range remained diminished (P 4 0.05) in the HF population (24 +/- 3 beat s min(-1)) compared with the AF group (41 +/- 4 beats.min(-1)). During CBR perturbation, the HF (14 +/- 1 beats.min(-1)) and AF (16 +/- 1 beats.min(-1 )) response ranges were similar. The arterial baroreflex response range was significantly less than the simple sum of the CBR and ABR (HF, 38 +/- 3 be ats.min(-1) and AF, 57 +/- 4 beats.min(-1)) in both fitness groups. Conclus ions: These data confirm that reductions in arterial-cardiac reflex sensiti vity are mediated by diminished ABR function. More importantly, these data suggest that the integrative relationship between the ABR and CBR contribut ing to arterial baroreflex control of HR is inhibitory in nature and not al tered by exercise training.