R. Dusing et H. Vetter, Compliance with antihypertensive therapy: Significance of the choice of antihypertensive drugs, NIEREN HOCH, 29(7), 2000, pp. 277-281
Compliance with antihypertensive therapy is poor. Changes in the timing sch
edule, omitted doses (so-called "drug holidays") and unauthorized ending of
therapy are common patterns of behavior. It appears that forgetfulness on
the one hand and a more or less "contemplated" decision on the other hand m
ay both play important roles as causative factors for partial non-complianc
e. Especially with the contemplated forms of non-compliance the underlying
factors involved remain largely unclear. Since arterial hypertension itself
may not be a symptomatic disorder, side effects of antihypertensive drugs
have long been suspected to play a crucial role in the long-term adherence
to antihypertensive therapy. Several large scale studies demonstrate that,
indeed, compliance may differ depending on the choice of the antihypertensi
ve drug. It also appears that the degree of partial or non-compliance may d
irectly correlate with the side effect profile of the different antihyperte
nsive drug classes. There is first evidence showing that the new class of a
ntihypertensives, the angiotensin II (type 1) receptor antagonists, which a
re characterized by a favorable side effect profile, may therefore be super
ior to other classes of antihypertensives by enhancing long-term compliance
with this treatment.