Critics have long been aware that William Wordsworth borrowed from the Germ
an balladist Gottfried August Burger in composing Lyrical Ballads (1798-180
0). Wordsworth was both attracted and repulsed by Burger's sensational and
sensationally popular verse, yet the reason for this ambiguity has continue
d to baffle scholars. In this essay I turn to ecological criticism to cast
a new light on the intertextual and cross-cultural exchange between Burger'
s "Der wilde Jager" and Wordsworth's "Hart-Leap Well". Wordsworth, I claim,
was intrigued by Burger's attempt to write a poem about hunting, yet in re
writing the German ballad Wordsworth also seeks to shift the emphasis somew
hat, in such a way as to focus more explicitly on what he believed to be th
e main issue at stake: man's shockingly cruel treatment of animals. In thus
reconceptualising Burger's poem, Wordsworth inaugurates a new kind of Roma
ntic nature poetry, which brings animals into the foreground and takes thei
r suffering seriously. In the essay's final section, I defend Wordsworth's
proto-ecological vision against critics who believe that Wordsworth's love
of nature caused him to lose interest in mankind. Far from leading necessar
ily to misanthropy, or disillusionment, I argue, the vision propounded in "
Hart-Leap Well" invites us to speculate how we can combine concern for the
environment with a concern for our fellow men.