Here, we will discuss the concept of subjective akathisia and present a pat
ient case. Our patient was suffering from neuroleptic-induced hypokinesia a
nd akathisia at the same time. The typical motor manifestations of akathisi
a were masked by hypokinesia, which made the diagnosis difficult. However,
the subjective symptoms of akathisia were evident and distressing. Although
not observable to bare eye, the pathognomonic pattern of motor activity de
tected in akathisia was demonstrated by actometric recording. Changing the
conventional neuroleptic to an atypical one brought relief to the subjectiv
e symptoms of akathisia and hypokinesia, while the motor activity was clear
ly diminished in actometric recording. Actometric recording may be useful i
n diagnosing akathisia masked by hypokinesia, but the typical subjective sy
mptoms of akathisia should not be ignored, even when actometry is not avail
able to demonstrate the missing motor component of akathisia. Not only akat
hisia defined by DSM-IV but also subjective akathisia should be adequately
treated to relieve the subjective distress, and to diminish the unfavorable
effects on psychotic symptoms, behavior, and drug compliance.