Biological knowledge does not fit the image of science that philosophers ha
ve developed. Many argue that biology has no laws. Here I criticize standar
d normative accounts of law and defend an alternative, pragmatic approach.
I argue that a multidimensional conceptual framework should replace the sta
ndard dichotomous law/accident distinction in order to display important di
fferences in the kinds of causal structure found in nature and the correspo
nding scientific representations of those structures. To this end I explore
the dimensions of stability, strength, and degree of abstraction that char
acterize the variety of scientific knowledge claims found in biology and ot
her sciences.