Jx. Zhu et al., THE COLEOPTILE CHLOROPLAST - DISTINCT DISTRIBUTION OF XANTHOPHYLL CYCLE PIGMENTS, AND ENRICHMENT IN PHOTOSYSTEM-II, Photosynthesis research, 51(2), 1997, pp. 137-147
Recent studies have shown that coleoptile chloroplasts operate the xan
thophyll cycle, and that their zeaxanthin concentration co-varies with
their sensitivity to blue light. The present study characterized the
distribution of photosynthetic pigments in thylakoid pigment-protein c
omplexes from dark-adapted and light-treated coleoptile and mesophyll
chloroplasts, the low temperature fluorescence emission spectra, and t
he rates of PS I and PS II electron transport in both types of chlorop
lasts from 5-day-old corn seedlings. Pigments were extracted from isol
ated PS I holocomplex, LHC IIb trimeric and LHC II monomeric complexes
and analyzed by HPLC. Chlorophyll distribution in coleoptile thylakoi
ds showed 31% of the total collected Chi in PS I and 65% in the light
harvesting complexes of PS II. In mesophyll thylakoids, the values wer
e 44% and 54%, respectively. Mesophyll and coleoptile PS I holocomplex
es differed in their Chi a/Ch1 b ratios (8.1 and 6.1, respectively) an
d beta-carotene content. In contrast, mesophyll and coleoptile LHC nb
trimers and LHC II monomers had similar Chi a/Ch1 b ratios and beta-ca
rotene content. The three analyzed pigment-protein complexes from dark
-adapted coleoptile chloroplasts contained zeaxanthin, whereas there w
as no detectable zeaxanthin in the complexes from dark-adapted mesophy
ll chloroplasts. In both chloroplast types, zeaxanthin and antheraxant
hin increased markedly in the three pigment-protein complexes upon ill
umination, while violaxanthin decreased. In mesophyll thylakoids, zeax
anthin distribution as a percentage of the xanthophyll cycle pool was:
LHC II monomers > LHC IIb trimers > PS I holocomplex, and in coleopti
le thylakoids, it was: LHC IIb trimers > LHC II monomers = PS I holoco
mplex. Low temperature (77 K) fluorescence emission spectra showed tha
t the 686 nm emission of coleoptile chloroplasts was approximately 50%
larger than that of mesophyll chloroplasts when normalized at 734 nm.
The pigment and fluorescence analysis data suggest that there is rela
tively more PS II per PS I and more LHC I per CC I in coleoptile chlor
oplasts than in mesophyll chloroplasts. Measurements of in vitro uncou
pled photosynthetic electron transport showed approximately 60% higher
rates of electron flow through PS II in coleoptile chloroplasts than
in mesophyll chloroplasts. Electron transport rates through PS I were
similar in both chloroplast types. Thus, when compared to mesophyll ch
loroplasts, coleoptile chloroplasts have a distinct PS I pigment compo
sition, a distinct chlorophyll distribution between PS I and PS II, a
distinct zeaxanthin percentage distribution among thylakoid pigment-pr
otein complexes, a higher PS II-related fluorescence emission, and hig
her PS II electron transport capacity. These characteristics may be as
sociated with a sensory transducing role of coleoptile chloroplasts.