Unilateral coronal synostosis results in dysmorphology of the midface in ad
dition to well-characterized cranial and orbital deformities. Because most
American infants with this problem have undergone cranio-orbital surgery wi
thin their first year of life for the past 25 years, a paucity of data exis
t regarding the natural history of untreated unilateral coronal synostosis.
In an attempt to remedy this void, an international search was conducted t
o identify computed tomography data sets of living individuals with untreat
ed unilateral coronal synostosis; data were obtained from two European cent
ers and one center in the United States. Results limited to the study of th
e midface are presented here.
Digital data from high-resolution head computed tomography scans of 11 livi
ng, white individuals with untreated unilateral coronal synostosis were obt
ained from three craniofacial centers (in Denmark, The Netherlands, and the
United States). Image volumes were constructed from each scan using ANALYZ
E biomedical imaging software. Fourteen pairs of three-dimensional distance
s were calculated on the ipsilateral (the side of the synostosis) and the c
ontralateral (the side opposite to the synostosis) hemifaces using 11 osseo
us landmarks. The resulting measurements were expressed as a ratio of the i
psilateral: contralateral sides. Descriptive statistics were derived for th
e untreated unilateral coronal synostosis population and compared with anal
ogous measurements performed on dried skulls. Age at computed tomography ra
nged from 1.1 to 21.1 years (mean, 6.6 years; median, 4.1 years). Twelve of
the 14 measured distances differed by greater than 5 percent on the ipsila
teral side, and all but one of these measurements were decreased on the ips
ilateral side when compared with contralateral values.
The results of this study support the following conclusions: (1) There are
discrete and measurable differences in the facial morphology between patien
ts with untreated unilateral coronal synostosis and normal skulls. (2) Inte
rcenter and international collaboration can provide a sufficient number of
individuals with rare craniofacial anomalies to quantitatively determine gr
oup characteristics. (3) Quantitative documentation of rare anomaly natural
history is necessary for quantitative outcome assessment of treated patien
ts.