Ju. Adams et al., Conditioned locomotor stimulant effects of cocaine in rats do not result from interference with habituation, PSYCHOPHAR, 151(1), 2000, pp. 13-18
Rationale: Classical conditioning has been proposed to account fur the hype
ractivity observed in drug-free rats when placed in an environment previous
ly paired with cocaine administration. However, an alternative explanation
is that hyperactivity results from an inability of rats to habituate to the
environment under the influence of cocaine. Objectives: In this study, pre
conditioning exposure to the test environment was increased from one sessio
n (standard procedure) to seven (modified procedure) to test the "antihabit
uation" hypothesis. Methods: After preconditioning exposure, six conditioni
ng sessions took place over a 10-day to 13-day period. Paired rats received
10 mg/kg cocaine i.p. prior to activity sessions and saline i.p. upon retu
rn to the colony room. Unpaired rats received saline prior to and cocaine a
fter activity sessions. Time-off rats were withheld from the activity boxes
, but were subject to all other procedures during conditioning. On the test
day, all rats received saline prior to activity sessions. Results: In the
standard procedure, paired rats exhibited significantly greater activity th
an unpaired rats on the test day, consistent with previous reports. In the
modified procedure, mean activity (all rats) decreased between the first an
d last preconditioning sessions. Still, the paired group exhibited granter
activity than the unpaired group on the test day, suggesting that a conditi
oned stimulant effect developed in habituated rats. Activity in the time-of
f group did not significantly differ from the unpaired group demonstrating
the habituation had not dissipated over this time period. Conclusions: Thes
e results support the conclusion that hyperactivity observed on the test da
y was not a result of antihabituation effects of cocaine.