Avoiding common pitfalls in qualitative data collection and transcription

Citation
Kl. Easton et al., Avoiding common pitfalls in qualitative data collection and transcription, QUAL HEAL R, 10(5), 2000, pp. 703-707
Citations number
7
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science
Journal title
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH
ISSN journal
10497323 → ACNP
Volume
10
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
703 - 707
Database
ISI
SICI code
1049-7323(200009)10:5<703:ACPIQD>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
The subjective nature of qualitative research necessitates scrupulous scien tific methods to ensure valid results. Although qualitative methods such as grounded theory, phenomenology, and ethnography yield rich data, consumers of research need to be able to trust the findings reported in such studies . Researchers are responsible for establishing the trustworthiness of quali tative research through a variety of ways. Specific challenges faced in the field can seriously threaten the dependability of the data. However, by mi nimizing potential errors that can occur when doing fieldwork, researchers can increase the trustworthiness of the study. The purpose of this article is to present three of the pitfalls that can occur in qualitative research during data collection and transcription: equipment failure, environmental hazards, and transcription errors. Specific strategies to minimize the risk for avoidable errors will be discussed.