Testing the causal link between a firm-specific competence and its antecede
nts or consequences has become a key objective for strategy research over t
he past decade. On one hand, case studies can identity a competence, but wi
th their small sample size, their retrospective research design, and their
tendency toward sampling on the dependent variable, they can not reliably r
est the causal connection between a competence and its antecedents or its c
onsequences. On the other hand, variance decomposition studies demonstrate
the existence of firm-specific performance differentials bur have not ident
ified which particular competencies are responsible for them. The present p
aper avoids both of these problems by measuring a particular competence acr
oss a large sample of organizations over a long period of time, so that a t
est of statistical causality can be applied to the relationship of this com
petence to both its antecedents and its consequences. The particular compet
ence studied is the ability of money market mutual funds to forecast change
s in short-term interest rates-a competence known from prior research to be
both valuable and rare. In particular, we test the effect of forecasting a
bility on the economic surplus generated by the fund and its growth. Conver
sely we also test the effect of growth on the subsequent development of for
ecasting ability Copyright (C) 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.