T. Kosuga et al., Surgical treatment for graft stenosis after repair of an interrupted aortic arch: Report of two cases, SURG TODAY, 30(8), 2000, pp. 754-758
We report herein two cases of patients who underwent successful reoperation
for graft stenosis after repair of an interrupted aortic arch (IAA). The f
irst patient was a 10-year-old girl who suffered from upper limb hypertensi
on 9 years after her initial operation. Cardiac catheterization revealed a
pressure gradient of 55 mmHg across the repaired arch. At reoperation, a le
ft subclavian turndown anastomosis was performed, following which the hyper
tension resolved and a cardiac catheterization done 5 years later demonstra
ted sufficient growth of the restored arch with no significant gradient. Th
e second patient was a 17-year-old boy who suffered from general fatigue an
d intermittent hypertension 12 pears after his initial operation. Cardiac c
atheterization revealed a gradient of 60 mmHg across the repaired arch. He
underwent an extraanatomic ascending to descending aortic bypass employing
an additional 18-mm graft, and a postoperative cardiac catheterization show
ed no gradient between the ascending and descending aorta. Our experience h
as shown that IAA should be repaired without prosthetic grafts if possible.
Although extraanatomic bypass is useful for reducing the operative risks a
t reoperation, a large graft should be used to avoid the need for a third o
peration. For young children expected to outgrow a second graft, performing
an endogenous anastomosis, such as a left subclavian turndown anastomosis,
should be considered as an alternative.