The five available p24 Ag/anti-HIV combined tests were compared to the six
third-generation anti-HIV assays mainly used in blood transfusion centers.
Among 70 selected HIV-1 positive samples (12 samples from early infected bl
ood donors and 58 from ten commercial panels), 59 were positive with at lea
st one assay. False negative results were observed Jot zero to six samples
with p24 Ag/Ab assays versus seven to 19 with antibody (Ab) tests. In five
cases, one or more combined assays gave a positive signal later than the mo
st sensitive Ab screening test. One sample with a high p24 Ag titer was mis
sed by one combined test. The mean time delay between thee most sensitive t
est and the second one was 0.3 to 2 days. The p24 Ag limit of detection was
investigated with severe dilutions of the HN Ag reference. The threshold o
f the p24 Ag detection was found to be between 65 and 250 pg/mL of HIV Ag.
For four of the five combines assays, p24 Ag detectability was assessed wit
h dilutions of infected culture cell supernatants from 13 HIV-I different g
enotype strains exhibiting HIV Ag titers from 300 to 450 pg/mL. One of the
four combined assays gave negative results but close to the cut-off for thr
ee supernatant dilutions (1 B, 1 F, 1 HIV-1/O) and one missed the HIV-1/O d
ilution. The p24 Ag/Ab combined assays permit an earlier diagnosis of HN in
fection than third generation assays even if the yield in terms of reductio
n of the window period is moderate. They are less sensitive than p24 Ag sre
ening assays for the detection of this marker. Consequently, the p24 Ag/Ab
assays have not been used for the diagnosis of a primary infection instead
of p24 Ag screening tests. They must be considered only as good tools for t
he detection of HIV infection. (C) 2000 Editions scientifiques et medicales
Elsevier SAS.