Following a role-theoretic perspective, we conceptualize employees who work
with customers as brokers between an organization and its customers. This
unique organizational position increases the likelihood that its occupants
will face conflicting demands from the two constituencies they serve, the o
rganization and the customer. We propose, however, that the work conditions
of resource adequacy, role clarity, and autonomy moderate the effect that
working with customers has on role conflict. Survey data from 5,811 employe
es at a national telecommunications firm are used to test these role-theore
tic hypotheses. Compared with those who do not work with customers, "custom
er work" does produce greater role conflict. Also, as hypothesized, when co
mparing customer work and noncustomer work, role clarity reduces role confl
ict more for noncustomer workers, whereas autonomy reduces it more for cust
omer workers. Suggestions are offered for additional applications of role t
heory to the study of employees who work with customers.