Systematic method for rating soil quality of conventional, organic, and integrated apple orchards in Washington State

Citation
Jd. Glover et al., Systematic method for rating soil quality of conventional, organic, and integrated apple orchards in Washington State, AGR ECO ENV, 80(1-2), 2000, pp. 29-45
Citations number
54
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT
ISSN journal
01678809 → ACNP
Volume
80
Issue
1-2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
29 - 45
Database
ISI
SICI code
0167-8809(200008)80:1-2<29:SMFRSQ>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
Much remains to be known concerning the complex relationships between speci fic soil property measurements and overall soil quality. The objective of t his study was to advance our understanding of these complex relationships b y further developing and applying a systematic method for evaluating the ef fects of conventional, integrated and organic apple production systems on s oil physical, chemical, and biological properties using a modified soil qua lity index. This index utilizes 1998 soils data from these three treatments . The study used four, 0.14 ha replicates of each of the three treatments i n a randomized complete block design. Experimental plots were planted to 'G olden Delicious' apples (Malus domestica Borkh.) in 1994 on a commercial or chard in the Yakima Valley of Washington state. Organic soil management pra ctices included additions of composted poultry manure and bark mulches and the use of mechanical tillage for weed control. Conventional soil managemen t practices included additions of synthetic fertilizers and the use of herb icides for weed control. The integrated system utilized practices from each of the other two systems. Increased aggregate stability, microbial biomass , and earthworm abundance were associated with improved soil quality under integrated management when compared to conventional management in 1998. Org anic management resulted in lower soil bulk densities and generally improve d biological soil properties compared to conventional management. Few signi ficant differences in soil properties were measured between the integrated and organic systems. The integrated production system received a soil quali ty index rating of 0.92 (out of 1.00), which was significantly higher than the index rating of 0.78 for the conventional production system; the organi c production system received a rating of 0.88, which was not significantly different from the other two systems. The study indicates that a well-devel oped soil quality index can provide an effective framework for evaluating t he overall effects of different orchard production practices on soil qualit y. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.