R. Von Sohsten et al., Cardiac tamponade in the "new device" era: Evaluation of 6999 consecutive percutaneous coronary interventions, AM HEART J, 140(2), 2000, pp. 279-283
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Background The incidence of cardiac perforation and pericardial tamponade a
ppears to be increasing in the era of new coronary interventional devices c
ompared with coronary balloon angioplasty.
Methods and Results We reviewed 6999 consecutive percutaneous coronary inte
rventions performed during 1994 to 1996 in a single urban university hospit
al catheterization laboratory. Data had been collected prospectively as par
t of an ongoing quality assurance program. Fifteen patients had cardiac tam
ponade within 36 hours of the procedure. Only 6 of these occurred during th
e interventional procedure; the others occurred 2 to 36 hours later. The me
dian patient age was 72 years. Nine (60%) patients were female. Three patie
nts received abciximab. Five perforations were at the target coronary arter
y site, 3 were caused by a guide wire tip in the distal part of the target
artery, and 7 represented right ventricular perforations caused by a tempor
ary pacemaker wire. Five of the 7 right ventricular perforations occurred d
uring rotational atherectomy procedures. Diagnosis was aided by immediate e
chocardiography. Treatment was medical, including pericardiocentesis, in 6
cases. The other 9 patients required surgical drainage and repair. All pati
ents survived the index hospitalization. At 18-month follow-up, 1 patient h
ad died, and all others were without apparent sequelae.
Conclusions Tamponade after percutaneous coronary intervention is not rare
in the "new device" era (overall incidence 0.2%); tamponade after percutane
ous coronary intervention is often delayed and may occur outside the cathet
erization suite; patients are more likely to be female and elderly; immedia
te echocardiography is an essential aid to diagnosis and prompt treatment,
and the use of temporary right ventricular pacing catheters must be reexami
ned.