Comparison of low-dose dobutamine ventriculography with low-dose dobutamine echocardiography for predicting regional improvement in left ventricular function after coronary artery bypass grafting
L. Dalla Vecchia et al., Comparison of low-dose dobutamine ventriculography with low-dose dobutamine echocardiography for predicting regional improvement in left ventricular function after coronary artery bypass grafting, AM J CARD, 86(4), 2000, pp. 371-374
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
The demonstration of a contractile reserve during low-dose dobutamine echoc
ardiography (LDDE) identifies viable myocardium and predicts recovery of le
ft ventricular (LV) function after myocardial revascularization in patients
with chronic coronary artery disease. However, a technically difficult tra
nsthoracic visualization may limit the use of LDDE, thus requiring an alter
native diagnostic procedure. The present study compares LDDE with low-dose
dobutamine ventriculography (LDDV) in predicting an improvement in regional
LV function after surgical revascularization, We studied 18 patients with
coronary artery disease and LV dysfunction who were to undergo coronary art
ery bypass grafting. Preoperatively, all patients were evaluated for the pr
esence of viable myocardium using LDDE and LDDV. Follow-up echocardiography
at rest and left ventriculography were performed 4 months after successful
revascularization to assess recovery of LV function. The sensitivity and s
pecificity of LDDE to identify dysfunctional segments capable of recovering
function were 63% and 71%, respectively, with a diagnostic accuracy of 68%
. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of LDDE improved to
81%, 72%, and 76% when patients with optimal transthoracic evaluation were
selected, whereas they were 30%, 77%, and 57%, respectively, in those who
underwent suboptimal evaluation. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnost
ic accuracy of LDDV were 66%, 75%, and 71%, respectively, with no differenc
e in subgroups of patients. This study demonstrates that LDDV can be consid
ered a useful technique for identifying the presence of myocardial viabilit
y and may provide an advantage over LDDE in patients with suboptimal echoca
rdiographic visualization. (C) 2000 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.