P. An et al., Major gene effect on subcutaneous fat distribution in a sedentary population and its response to exercise training: The HERITAGE Family Study, AM J HUM B, 12(5), 2000, pp. 600-609
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
Sociology & Antropology","Medical Research General Topics
Complex segregation analysis of baseline subcutaneous fat distribution and
the change in response to exercise training (post-training minus baseline i
ndices) was performed in a sample of 482 individuals from 99 Caucasian fami
lies who participated in the HERITAGE Family Study. The sum of skinfold (SF
) thicknesses at eight sites, and the waist and hip circumferences were mea
sured at baseline and after completing a 20-week exercise training program.
The trunk-to-extremity ratio (TER) was calculated by dividing the sum of s
kinfold thicknesses at four trunk sites (subscapular + suprailiac + abdomin
al + midaxillary) by the sum of skinfold thicknesses at four extremity site
s (triceps + biceps + medial calf + thigh). While SF was used to assess tot
al subcutaneous adiposity, TER and the ratio of the waist-to-hip circumfere
nces (WHR) were used to characterize subcutaneous fat distribution. Baselin
e TER and WHR were age-adjusted and age-SE-adjusted within four sex-by-gene
ration groups. The changes of SF, TER, and WHR in response to training were
adjusted for age effects alone and for the effects of age and baseline val
ues. Baseline SF was influenced by a multifactorial component (30%) plus a
major effect that may be environmental in origin accounting for 47% of the
variance. Baseline TER was influenced by a multifactorial component (18%) a
nd a major codominant gene (q(2) = 0.10), which accounted for 56% of the va
riance. The major gene effect was independent of total subcutaneous adiposi
ty. Baseline WHR was regulated by a major codominant gene (q(2) = 0.15), wh
ich accounted for 48% of the variance. However, this major gene effect for
baseline WHR should be interpreted with caution, given the estimates of the
tau's under the general model. No familial effect was found for the change
s in response to training for these subcutaneous adiposity and fat distribu
tion phenotypes. (C) 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.