B. Nelson et al., Class II correction in patients treated with Class II elastics and with fixed functional appliances: A comparative study, AM J ORTHOD, 118(2), 2000, pp. 142-149
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry/Oral Surgery & Medicine
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS
The aim of the present study was to evaluate quantitatively the skeletal an
d dental changes contributing to Class II corrections in subjects treated w
ith Class II elastics (Begg technique) compared with subjects treated with
fixed functional appliances (Herbst appliance). Thirty-six male patients wi
th Class II, Division 1 malocclusions whose treatment had not included extr
action were investigated. Eighteen were treated with the Begg technique, an
d eighteen were treated with Herbst appliance for an average period of 1.3
and 0.5 years, respectively. Lateral radiographs in habitual occlusion were
taken at the start of treatment and 12 months afterwards. In the Begg grou
p, the maxilla moved forward 1 mm more than in the Herbst group, and the ma
ndible moved 1 mm more in the Herbst group than in the Begg group. The skel
etal improvement in the Herbst group exceeded the changes in the Begg group
by, on average, 2.0 mm (P < .01). The overjet reduction in the Begg group
was larger (2.1 mm; P < .01) than in the Herbst group, mostly because of de
ntal movements. The skeletal part of the overjet reduction was 4% in the Be
gg group compared with 51% in the Herbst group. The molar correction was si
milar in both groups, but in the Begg group, the skeletal improvement was 1
0%, compared with 66% in the Herbst group. The overbite correction and the
increase in the anterior lower facial height and in the NSL/ML angle were l
arger in the Begg group (P < .05). The conclusions of this study were that
the changes contributing to the Class II corrections in Begg and Herbst the
rapy were skeletal and dental. The skeletal changes were, however, larger i
n the Herbst-treated group. On the other hand, favorable and unfavorable ve
rtical changes were more pronounced in the group treated with Class II elas
tics.