Comparison of different biomaterials for glaucoma drainage devices - Part 2

Citation
Rs. Ayyala et al., Comparison of different biomaterials for glaucoma drainage devices - Part 2, ARCH OPHTH, 118(8), 2000, pp. 1081-1084
Citations number
6
Categorie Soggetti
Optalmology,"da verificare
Journal title
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
ISSN journal
00039950 → ACNP
Volume
118
Issue
8
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1081 - 1084
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-9950(200008)118:8<1081:CODBFG>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
Background: Inflammation associated with biomaterials may contribute to the failure of glaucoma drainage devices. Objective: To compare the inflammatory reaction associated with the inserti on of Krupin silicone, Molteno polypropylene, and Acrosof end plates in the subconjunctival space of rabbits. Methods: Similar-sized glaucoma end plates made of 3 different biomaterials were sutured to the sclera in the superotemporal quadrant of the rabbit ey e. Thirty eyes of 15 albino New Zealand rabbits were randomly assigned to t he 3 groups. Conjunctival vascular hyperemia was graded in a masked fashion among the 3 groups. At the end of 3 weeks, the enucleated eyes were examin ed histologically and by scanning electron microscopy. Results: Molteno polypropylene was associated with more inflammation both i n clinical observations and based on histological grading. Silicone and Acr osof were associated with less intense inflammation. One polypropylene end plate was extruded on day 21. Conclusions: Polypropylene appears to be more inflammatory than silicone. F lexible biomaterials appear to be less inflammatory than rigid ones. Clinical Relevance: Bleb failure following glaucoma drainage device implant ation could be related to the biomaterial-associated inflammation. Choosing a biomaterial with the least inflammatory potential might enhance the succ ess rate of the glaucoma drainage device.