M. Lorber et al., Testing the USA EPA's ISCST-Version 3 model on dioxins: a comparison of predicted and observed air and soil concentrations, ATMOS ENVIR, 34(23), 2000, pp. 3995-4010
The central purpose of our study was to examine the performance of the Unit
ed States Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) nonreactive Gaussian air
quality dispersion model, the Industrial Source Complex Short-Term Model (I
SCST3) Version 98226, in predicting polychlorinated dibenzodioxins and poly
chlorinated dibenzofurans concentrations (subsequently referred to as dioxi
ns and furans, or CDD/Fs) in both air and soil near the Columbus Municipal
Solid Waste-to-Energy Facility (CMSWTE) in Columbus, OH. During its 11 yr o
peration, the CMSWTE was estimated to be emitting nearly 1 kg of CDD/F Toxi
c Equivalents (TEQs) per year, making it one of the highest single emitters
of dioxin in the United States during its operation. An ambient air-monito
ring study conducted in 1994, prior to its shutdown in December of 1994, cl
early identified high dioxin air concentration in the downwind direction du
ring two sampling events. In one of the events, the CMSWTE stack was concur
rently monitored for dioxins, A soil sampling study conducted in 1995/1996
was similarly able to identify an area of impacted soil extending mainly in
the predominant downwind direction up to 3 km from the CMSWTE, Site-specif
ic information, including meteorological data, stack parameters and emissio
n rates, and terrain descriptions, were input into ISCST3 to predict ground
-level 48-h concentrations which could be compared with the 48-h measured a
ir concentrations. Predicted annual average dry and wet deposition of parti
cle-bound dioxins were input into a simple soil reservoir model to predict
soil concentrations that would be present after 11.5 yr of emissions, which
were compared to measured concentrations. Both soil- and air-predicted con
centrations were generally within a factor of 10 of observations, and judge
d to be reasonable given the small number of observations and the uncertain
ties of the exercise. Principal uncertainties identified and discussed incl
ude: source characterization (stack emission rates of dioxins), meteorologi
cal data, and atmospheric and soil fate and transformation processes of the
dioxins (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd, All rights reserved.