So concepts aren't definitions, but do they have necessary or sufficient features?

Citation
Em. Pothos et U. Hahn, So concepts aren't definitions, but do they have necessary or sufficient features?, BR J PSYCHO, 91, 2000, pp. 439-450
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology
Journal title
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY
ISSN journal
00071269 → ACNP
Volume
91
Year of publication
2000
Part
3
Pages
439 - 450
Database
ISI
SICI code
0007-1269(200008)91:<439:SCADBD>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
Rips (1989) is one of the most widely cited demonstrations of the relevance of critical features in conceptual structure. A critical feature will impo se constraints on how an object is classified, regardless of other factors, such as overall similarity. We review and clarify critical features propos als in terms of whether an assumption is being made about necessary feature s, sufficient features, or both (i.e. a definition). On the basis of this, we scrutinize Rips' investigation and present our own empirical re-evaluati on of this work. The results reported here do not support any strong view o f necessary or sufficient features.