Prognostic impact of P53 status in Ewing sarcoma

Citation
E. De Alava et al., Prognostic impact of P53 status in Ewing sarcoma, CANCER, 89(4), 2000, pp. 783-792
Citations number
46
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
CANCER
ISSN journal
0008543X → ACNP
Volume
89
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
783 - 792
Database
ISI
SICI code
0008-543X(20000815)89:4<783:PIOPSI>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
BAGKGROUND. Disease stage at the time of diagnosis and response to therapy are the main prognostic factors for patients with Ewing sarcoma or peripher al neuroectodermal tumor (ES/PNET). The primary genetic alteration in ES/PN ET, the fusion of the EWS gene with FLI1 or ERG, is diagnostically highly s pecific for these tumors, and molecular variation in the structure of the E WS-FLI1 fusion gene also is of prognostic significance. In contrast, second ary genetic alterations, such as P53 alterations, are relatively uncommon i n ES/PNET, and their prognostic impact has not been extensively studied. METHODS. Prechemotherapy, paraffin embedded, nondecalcified, primary tumor material in a well-characterized series of 55 patients with ES/PNET with de fined EWS-FLI1 fusion transcripts (32 patients with type 1 and 23 patients with other types) was studied retrospectively by immunohistochemical techni ques for cell cycle regulators and proliferative markers, such as P53, p21( WAF1), and Ki-67, as well as by the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-m ediated dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) technique for apoptosis. Nuclear P53 expression in > 20% of tumor cells was scored as aberrant overexpression. Histologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was assessed. RESULTS. Aberrant P53 expression (in > 20% of tumor cells) was present in 6 patients (11%) but showed no statistically significant correlation with di sease stage, tumor size, proliferation rate (Ki-67), apoptotic rate (TUNEL) , or EWS-FLI1 fusion type. By univariate analysis, the P53 > 20% group show ed a significantly poorer overall survival among patients with localized di sease (n = 43 patients) (P = 0.001) and in the entire study group (P = 0.01 ). In multivariate Cox analyses of overall survival, P53 > 20% was the stro ngest negative factor among prognostic factors available at the time of dia gnosis (P = 0.001; relative risk [RR] = 9) and when chemotherapy response w as included in the analysis (P53 > 20%: P = 0.01; RR = 10). CONCLUSIONS. P53 alteration appears to define a small clinical subset of pa tients with ES/PNET with a markedly poor outcome. The current observations warrant a systematic prospective study with comprehensive P53 mutation anal ysis. [See related article on pages 793-9, this issue.] (C) 2000 American C ancer Society.