The role of prostate specific antigen (PSA) as a screening test for prostat
e cancer is controversial. Proponents of screening emphasize that early det
ection can lead to discovery of organ-confined disease and the potential fo
r cure. Opponents point to the lack of credible evidence that screening is
associated with a decrease in mortality, In addition, population-based scre
ening (with subsequent diagnosis and treatment in many men) can be associat
ed with considerable morbidity and mortality in the context of a disease th
at is often not fatal. This report examines the limitations of PSA as a scr
eening test and supports an approach using "verbal informed consent" to ide
ntify patients who should be rested.