Ms. Simmons et al., Unpredictability of deception in compliance with physician-prescribed bronchodilator inhaler use in a clinical trial, CHEST, 118(2), 2000, pp. 290-295
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Objective: To identify subject characteristics that may be predictive of in
tentional dumping of metered-dose inhalers (MDIs) during a clinical trial,
Design: Nebulizer Chronologs (NCs; Medtrac Technologies; Lakewood, CO), whi
ch record the date and time of each MDI actuation, were attached to the MDI
s of participants who were given a prescribed medication schedule to follow
in a clinical trial. Participants were not informed of the function of the
NC or that their medication use was being monitored.
Setting: The Lung Health Study, a 5-year clinical trial to evaluate the eff
ect of intensive smoking cessation counseling and regular use of an inhaled
bronchodilator on the progression of COPD,
Participants: One hundred one smokers, 35 to 60 years of age, with mild to
moderate airways obstruction enrolled in The Lung Health Study.
Measurements and results: Thirty of these 101 participants (30%) actuated t
heir inhalers > 100 times within a 3-h interval on at least one occasion du
ring the first year of this 5-year trial. Only 1 of an additional 135 parti
cipants who had full foreknowledge of the MDI monitoring capability of the
NC did so. Most of these dumping episodes occurred shortly before a clinic
follow-up visit, suggesting an active attempt to hide noncompliance from th
e clinic staff. Whereas self-reported inhaler usage and canister weights we
re similar for the "dumpers" and "nondumpers," NC data indicated significan
tly lower compliance rates for dumpers (chi(2); p < 0.05), When demographic
variables, treatment and clinic assignments, smoking status, pulmonary fun
ction test results, respiratory symptoms, and disease history of dumpers an
d nondumpers were analyzed, no predictors of dumping could be found,
Conclusions: Deception among noncompliers occurs frequently in clinical tri
als, is often not revealed by the usual methods of monitoring, and cannot b
e predicted by data readily available in clinical trials.