Psychological functioning and quality of life in lung transplant candidates and recipients

Citation
Mm. Limbos et al., Psychological functioning and quality of life in lung transplant candidates and recipients, CHEST, 118(2), 2000, pp. 408-416
Citations number
47
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
CHEST
ISSN journal
00123692 → ACNP
Volume
118
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
408 - 416
Database
ISI
SICI code
0012-3692(200008)118:2<408:PFAQOL>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the psychological funct ioning and quality of life (QOL) of lung transplant candidates and recipien ts. Methods: The following measures were completed by 36 lung transplant candid ates (the pretransplant group [PRE]) and 73 recipients (the posttransplant group [POST]): the Rand-36 Item Health Survey 1.0 (RAND-36), visual analog scale of overall QOL (OQOL), Brief Symptoms Inventory (BSI), Derogatis Sexu al Functioning Inventory (DSFI), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD ), Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES), and Body Cathexis Scale (BC). Results: Compared to the PRE, POST patients had significantly better scores on the following measures: RAND-36 total, physical health, role limitation s due to physical health, general health, vitality, and social functioning subscales (all p < 0.0001); visual analog scale of OQOL (p < 0.0001); BSI ( p < 0.05); BC (p < 0.05); HAD anxiety(p < 0.05) and depression (p < 0.0001) ; and RSES (p < 0.05). Despite better scores, some areas did not differ bet ween the PRE and the POST, and many patients continued to experience impair ments in psychological functioning. Specifically, the RAND-36 emotional hea lth and role limitations due to emotional health subscale scores did not di ffer between the PRE and the POST and they remained lower than published no rms. A significant proportion of patients in both groups (44% of PRE patien ts and 28% of POST patients) had borderline or clinical levels of anxiety ( ie, the HAD). Finally, PRE and POST mean scores were significantly lower th an published norms on the RSES (p < 0.05) and the body image scale of the D SFI (p < 0.05), Conclusions: Although lung transplant recipients have better general, physi cal, and psychological health than their pretransplant counterparts, the pr esent research suggests that both groups experience impairment in several a reas of psychological functioning, Future research into the QOL of the lung transplant population should be aimed at recognizing, intervening, and imp roving patients' psychological and emotional well-being.