Objectives. The purposes of this study were: (1) to identify the primary (h
ip) and secondary (neighboring joints) impairments during gait in subjects
with a total hip arthroplasty total hip arthroplasty, (2) to determine whic
h impairments persist when controlling for gait speed and (3) to study the
relationships between primary and secondary impairments in order to describ
e the locomotor strategies used by these patients.
Design. This cross-sectional study compared the gait patterns of women with
a total hip arthroplasty to those of healthy women.
Background. Several studies have reported residual hip impairments in the s
agittal plane during gait after a total hip arthroplasty. There is, however
, a substantial lack of knowledge in regard to the changes at the neighbori
ng joints and in the other planes of movement.
Methods. Subjects have been examined during a gait laboratory testing sessi
on including the simultaneous recording of three-dimensional kinematics and
ground reaction forces on one side, and bilateral activation of six lower
limb muscles.
Results. A significant decrease of 20% in the hip extensor moment of force
during the early stance phase was correlated (R-2 = 43%) with a significant
decrease of 14% in gait speed. Moreover, a significant decrease of 59% in
the range of hip extension at the end of the stance phase was observed toge
ther with secondary impairments such as a significant increase in the anter
ior pelvic rotation, in knee flexion and in ankle dorsiflexion. Lastly, a s
ignificant increase in ipsilateral bending of the trunk during the single l
imb support on the operated limb was concomitant with a significant decreas
e in the hip abductor moment of force.
Conclusions. The decrease in gait speed and the persistence of abnormal gai
t patterns one year after the total hip arthroplasty were associated respec
tively with a decrease in the hip extensor moment of force and with a decre
ase in the range of hip extension (sagittal plane) or in the hip abductor m
oment of force (frontal plane). (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights r
eserved.