M. Rossier et al., FESCC survey on accreditation and post-graduate training in clinical chemistry in European countries, CLIN CH L M, 38(4), 2000, pp. 371-376
Promotion of the professional growth and development of specialists in the
field of clinical chemistry in European countries, and harmonisation of qua
lity assessment and accreditation procedures are listed among the main goal
s and activities of Federation of European Societies of Clinical Chemistry
(FESCC), according to its 1999-2000 strategic plan.
The European countries that are members of the European Union are in the pr
ocess of establishing the "European Register for Clinical Chemists", based
on minimum standards of education, training and experience as defined by th
e European Communities Confederation of Clinical Chemists (EC4). Many other
European countries would like to adapt their system of professional educat
ion to this model. Data on postgraduate training in EC4 FESCC members have
already been gathered in 1998. However, at the present time, there is no de
tailed knowledge of pre- and post-graduate professional education of specia
lists in clinical chemistry in the non-EC4 European countries.
FESCC launched a survey in July 1998 in order to gather this information wi
th the hope to start a database about existing systems. All FESCC members r
eceived the same questionnaire on accreditation (seven questions) and non-E
C4 FESCC members received an additional questionnaire with 11 questions rel
ated to post-graduate training in clinical chemistry.
The response rate of the 35 FESCC member countries was 93% from the 15 EC4
members (14 responses/15 countries) and 80% from the 20-non-EC4 (16 respons
es/20 countries). The heterogeneity of the data on post-graduate training i
n clinical chemistry indicates that a great effort will be needed before ha
rmonisation is reached. These results, however, will provide an interesting
basis for further discussion and promotion of post-graduate training in cl
inical chemistry.
The data provided on accreditation show that the total number of accredited
laboratories was relatively low in EC4 countries and even lower in non-EC4
members. It was not surprising to see that the number of accredited labora
tories was the highest in the two countries which started accreditation the
earliest (i.e. Sweden and UK, 1992). This situation, however, is changing
at a fast rate in most countries and the number of the accredited sites is
expected to increase rapidly in the next few years.