The compelling power of humor makes it a recurrent topic for research in ma
ny fields, including communication. Three theories of humor creation emerge
in humor research: the relief theory, which focuses on physiological relea
se of tension; the incongruity theory, singling out violations of a rationa
lly learned pattern; and the superiority theory, involving a sense of victo
ry or triumph. Each theory helps to explain the creation of different aspec
ts of humor, but each runs into problems explaining rhetorical applications
of humor. Because each theory of humor origin tries to explain all instanc
es of humor, the diverging communication effects of humor remain unexplaine
d. Humor's enactment leads to 4 basic functions of humor in communication.
Two tend to unite communicators: the identification and the clarification f
unctions. The other 2 tend to divide 1 set of communicators from others: th
e enforcement and differentiation functions. Exploration of these effects-b
ased functions of humor will clarify understanding of its rise in messages.
Humor use unites communicators through mutual identification and clarifica
tion of positions and values, while dividing them through enforcement of no
rms and differentiation of acceptable versus unacceptable behaviors or peop
le. This paradox in the functions of humor in communication as, alternately
, a unifier and divider, allows humor use to delineate social boundaries.