Evaluating and managing cumulative effects: Process and constraints

Authors
Citation
Lh. Macdonald, Evaluating and managing cumulative effects: Process and constraints, ENVIR MANAG, 26(3), 2000, pp. 299-315
Citations number
88
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ISSN journal
0364152X → ACNP
Volume
26
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
299 - 315
Database
ISI
SICI code
0364-152X(200009)26:3<299:EAMCEP>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
Cumulative effects (CEs) result from the combined effect of multiple activi ties over space or time. This implies a persistence through time and often a transmittal mechanism through space. Environmental legislation often requ ires a broader CE assessment in addition to the more direct. project-specif ic impacts. Current efforts to evaluate and manage CEs are hampered by the conceptual problems of defining the key issues. specifying the appropriate spatial and temporal scales, and determining the numerous interactions and indirect effects. These problems can be greatly alleviated by following an explicit process. The process proposed in this paper includes a scoping pha se, an analysis phase, and a planning and management phase, with each phase consisting of two to five discrete but interrelated tasks. Numerous approaches have been developed to assess CEs, and these range from simple checklists to complex, physically based models. The utility of each approach depends on the resource of concern, relative risk to those resour ces, information available, and time frame for the evaluation. in nearly al l cases the assessment and regulation of CEs is severely hampered by the va riability in site conditions and management effects, inability to predict s econdary or indirect effects, lack of data on recovery rates, difficulty of validating predictive models, and uncertainty of future events. Since any proposed activity could contribute to a wide range of potential C Es at different spatial and temporal scales, a tiered or nested approach sh ould be followed to assess CEs. The difficulty of assessing and predicting CEs also suggests that in many cases the most efficient approach is to focu s on minimizing on-site impacts. Under some circumstances adaptive manageme nt can also be a viable alternative to detailed CE assessments. Regular mon itoring and feedback is critical to the successful management and regulatio n of CEs.