Cumulative effects (CEs) result from the combined effect of multiple activi
ties over space or time. This implies a persistence through time and often
a transmittal mechanism through space. Environmental legislation often requ
ires a broader CE assessment in addition to the more direct. project-specif
ic impacts. Current efforts to evaluate and manage CEs are hampered by the
conceptual problems of defining the key issues. specifying the appropriate
spatial and temporal scales, and determining the numerous interactions and
indirect effects. These problems can be greatly alleviated by following an
explicit process. The process proposed in this paper includes a scoping pha
se, an analysis phase, and a planning and management phase, with each phase
consisting of two to five discrete but interrelated tasks.
Numerous approaches have been developed to assess CEs, and these range from
simple checklists to complex, physically based models. The utility of each
approach depends on the resource of concern, relative risk to those resour
ces, information available, and time frame for the evaluation. in nearly al
l cases the assessment and regulation of CEs is severely hampered by the va
riability in site conditions and management effects, inability to predict s
econdary or indirect effects, lack of data on recovery rates, difficulty of
validating predictive models, and uncertainty of future events.
Since any proposed activity could contribute to a wide range of potential C
Es at different spatial and temporal scales, a tiered or nested approach sh
ould be followed to assess CEs. The difficulty of assessing and predicting
CEs also suggests that in many cases the most efficient approach is to focu
s on minimizing on-site impacts. Under some circumstances adaptive manageme
nt can also be a viable alternative to detailed CE assessments. Regular mon
itoring and feedback is critical to the successful management and regulatio
n of CEs.